The `getModelDtlsByFields` method constructs a query using user-supplied data without proper sanitization or parameterization, making it susceptible to SQL injection attacks.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary SQL commands, potentially leading to complete database compromise and unauthorized access to sensitive information.
Mitigation:
Use parameterized queries or prepared statements with a dedicated query builder like Spring Data JPA's Specification API. Avoid direct user input in dynamic SQL construction.
Line:
45
OWASP Category:
A03:2021 - Injection
NIST 800-53:
AC-3 - Implement access enforcement to prevent unauthorized data exposure.
CVSS Score:
9.1
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The application uses a raw SQL query string without proper parameterization, making it susceptible to SQL injection attacks. This can be exploited by an attacker to manipulate the database queries.
Impact:
An attacker could execute arbitrary SQL commands, potentially leading to data loss or unauthorized access to sensitive information in the database.
Mitigation:
Use parameterized queries or prepared statements with input validation to prevent SQL injection. Consider using ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) tools that automatically handle parameterization and escaping for query parameters.
Line:
OWASP Category:
A03:2021 - Injection
NIST 800-53:
AC-3 - Access Enforcement
CVSS Score:
9.8
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The application does not properly sanitize user input in the database queries, which makes it susceptible to SQL injection attacks. This can lead to unauthorized data access and manipulation.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to the database, potentially leading to complete compromise of the system and exposure of sensitive customer information.
Mitigation:
Use parameterized queries or stored procedures with input validation to prevent SQL injection. Consider implementing an API gateway that can filter out malicious inputs before they reach the backend services.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A03:2021 - Injection
NIST 800-53:
AC-6, CM-6
CVSS Score:
9.8
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The application does not implement any authentication mechanism. This makes it vulnerable to unauthenticated access, which can lead to unauthorized actions and data exposure.
Impact:
Unauthorized users could perform arbitrary actions on the system, potentially leading to data theft or manipulation.
Mitigation:
Implement a proper authentication mechanism such as HTTP basic authentication, OAuth, or API keys. Ensure that all endpoints require appropriate authentication before access is granted.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A07:2021 - Authentication Failures
NIST 800-53:
AC-2, AC-3, IA-2
CVSS Score:
9.8
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The application does not properly validate the 'modelId' parameter when making a request to an external service. This can lead to server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks where an attacker can make arbitrary requests from the server.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to perform SSRF attacks, accessing internal services and data that might be sensitive or confidential. This could also lead to unauthorized disclosure of information or even remote code execution on the server if the external service is misconfigured.
Mitigation:
Implement strict validation and whitelisting for all parameters passed to external services. Use a safe list approach to ensure only expected values are allowed, and avoid using user-controlled inputs directly in requests to external systems without proper sanitization or validation.
Line:
29
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
SC-13: Cryptographic Protection
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The application does not enforce authentication checks for operations that modify data, such as the 'updateByModelId' and 'deleteById' endpoints. This could allow unauthenticated users to perform these actions.
Impact:
Unauthenticated users can change or delete critical data without authorization, leading to potential data integrity issues and unauthorized access to sensitive information.
Mitigation:
Enforce authentication checks for all operations that modify data. Use security headers like 'WWW-Authenticate' and 'Authorization' to ensure only authenticated users can perform such actions.
Line:
29-40
OWASP Category:
A07:2021 - Authentication Failures
NIST 800-53:
AC-6: Least Privilege
CVSS Score:
7.1
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The application uses hardcoded credentials in the 'generateModelId' endpoint to create a model ID. This increases the risk of unauthorized access and data leakage.
Impact:
Hardcoded credentials can be easily accessed and used by anyone with access to the codebase, leading to potential misuse and unauthorized access to sensitive information.
Mitigation:
Avoid hardcoding any credentials in your application. Use secure methods such as environment variables or a secrets management service for storing and accessing credentials.
Line:
45-46
OWASP Category:
A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
NIST 800-53:
IA-2: Identification and Authentication
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The entity class `EzaAiModelDtls` stores sensitive information including `modelId`, `modelNm`, `modelTyp`, `modelCtgry`, and potentially other fields in plain text. This includes the use of @Column annotations without specifying encryption or obfuscation, which exposes these fields to potential interception and unauthorized access.
Impact:
Unauthorized individuals could gain access to sensitive information stored in the database, leading to further exploitation through phishing attacks or data breaches.
Mitigation:
Consider using secure storage mechanisms such as AES encryption for sensitive fields. Implement a policy where all persistent data is encrypted at rest unless absolutely necessary to store unencrypted data for operational purposes.
Line:
OWASP Category:
A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
NIST 800-53:
SC-28 - Protection of Information at Rest
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The application does not enforce secure configurations for the database and authentication mechanisms. For example, there is no configuration to ensure that only trusted sources can access the database or that strong authentication methods are used.
Impact:
Unauthorized users could gain access to sensitive data through default settings. This includes scenarios where credentials might be stored in plain text or weak encryption methods are employed without proper justification.
Mitigation:
Implement strict security configurations for all components, including databases and authentication mechanisms. Use secure defaults and override them only when absolutely necessary. Regularly review and update configuration settings to align with the latest security best practices.
Line:
OWASP Category:
A05:2021 - Security Misconfiguration
NIST 800-53:
CM-6 - Configuration Settings
CVSS Score:
7.0
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The `UpdateEzaAiModelDtls` data class includes a field for `modelId`, which is intended to be used in an update operation. However, there is no validation or restriction on who can modify this value, potentially allowing unauthorized users to change the model ID of any record.
Impact:
An attacker could manipulate the model ID, leading to unauthorized access or modification of critical system data and functionality.
Mitigation:
Implement input validation in the update endpoint to ensure that only authorized users can modify the `modelId`. Consider implementing role-based access control (RBAC) checks before allowing updates to this field.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
NIST 800-53:
AC-2, AC-3
CVSS Score:
7.4
Related CVE:
None identified directly but related to CWE-863.
Priority:
Immediate
The service does not properly authenticate the user before allowing access to sensitive operations. The `updateByModelId` method allows updating model details without proper authentication, which can lead to unauthorized data modification.
Impact:
An attacker could modify critical model details without authorization, leading to significant disruption and potential loss of trust in the system.
Mitigation:
Implement a strong authentication mechanism such as OAuth 2.0 with JWT tokens for all sensitive operations. Validate user credentials before allowing access to these methods using Spring Security or equivalent framework.
Line:
45-52
OWASP Category:
A07:2021 - Authentication Failures
NIST 800-53:
AC-2, AC-3 - Implement proper authentication mechanisms and enforce least privilege access.
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The `findAll` and `findById` methods expose sensitive information about the model details without proper authorization checks, which can lead to unauthorized data exposure.
Impact:
An attacker could obtain detailed information about models including their configurations and status, potentially leading to further exploitation of other vulnerabilities or direct access to sensitive data.
Mitigation:
Restrict access to these methods to authorized personnel only. Implement role-based access control (RBAC) using Spring Security annotations such as `@PreAuthorize` for method level security checks.
Line:
21, 24
OWASP Category:
A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
NIST 800-53:
AC-6 - Implement least privilege access controls.
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The repository interface allows querying by modelId without proper authorization check. This could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information or functionality.
Impact:
Unauthorized users can retrieve and manipulate data related to models, potentially leading to data leakage or unauthorized modification of critical system components.
Mitigation:
Implement a proper authorization mechanism that checks user permissions before allowing queries based on modelId. Consider using Spring Security for role-based access control.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
NIST 800-53:
AC-2, AC-6, AC-3
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The application allows all origins to be specified in the CORS configuration, which can lead to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. Using '*' for allowed origins does not provide any protection against CSRF as it is too permissive.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by tricking a user into performing actions they are not intended to perform, potentially leading to unauthorized actions or data leakage.
Mitigation:
Use addAllowedOrigin instead of addAllowedOriginPattern and specify exact origins that should be allowed. Alternatively, use a more restrictive pattern if only certain domains need access.
Line:
10
OWASP Category:
A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
NIST 800-53:
AC-2, AC-6, SC-8
CVSS Score:
7.4
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The code exposes a method `findByModelIdAndModelVerIsNull` which does not enforce any authorization check. This allows unauthenticated users to retrieve sensitive information about model training histories based on the provided `modelId`. This breaks the principle of least privilege and access control.
Impact:
Unauthorized users can gain access to sensitive data, leading to potential privacy violations or unauthorized use of proprietary AI models.
Mitigation:
Implement proper authorization checks using Spring Security annotations such as @PreAuthorize or custom security logic to ensure that only authorized users can access this method. Consider implementing role-based access control (RBAC) and input validation for the modelId parameter.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
NIST 800-53:
AC-2, AC-6, IA-2
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The application does not properly validate the input for the '/searchByModelIdAndFields/{modelId}' endpoint, allowing an attacker to craft a request that could lead to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This can be exploited to access internal resources or services that are otherwise inaccessible.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to perform SSRF attacks, accessing unauthorized data or interacting with internal systems. This could lead to disclosure of sensitive information, unauthorized actions, and potentially complete compromise of the system.
Mitigation:
Implement strict input validation and sanitization for all user-provided inputs. Use whitelisting mechanisms to restrict acceptable values and patterns. Consider implementing a deny list approach to block known malicious endpoints or protocols.
Line:
45-52
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The application uses hardcoded credentials in the service layer for database connections, which poses a significant security risk. If these credentials are compromised, they could be used to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data.
Impact:
Compromised hardcoded credentials can lead to unauthorized access and exposure of sensitive information stored in the database. This could result in severe financial losses or legal consequences for the organization.
Mitigation:
Refactor the application to use secure methods for storing and retrieving credentials, such as using environment variables or a secrets management service. Ensure that these credentials are not hardcoded anywhere in the source code.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A07:2021 - Authentication Failures
NIST 800-53:
IA-2 - Identification and Authentication
CVSS Score:
6.1
Related CVE:
None identified
Priority:
Immediate
The data class `CreateEzaAiModelTrainingHstry` contains several fields that are not marked as sensitive but should be treated as such, including `agentId`, `processCd`, `modelUrl`, `dataUrl`, and potentially others. Storing these values in plain text can lead to unauthorized access if the system is compromised.
Impact:
Sensitive information could be accessed by malicious users or attackers leading to further exploitation of other vulnerabilities.
Mitigation:
Mark all non-sensitive fields as `@Transient` in Kotlin, or use secure storage mechanisms for sensitive data. Ensure proper encryption and access controls are implemented for stored data.
Line:
OWASP Category:
A08:2021 - Software and Data Integrity Failures
NIST 800-53:
SC-28
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The `modelId` and other fields in the data classes are not properly validated or sanitized before use. This can lead to SSRF attacks where an attacker can make requests from the server, potentially accessing internal resources.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access unauthorized data or perform actions within the system that they should not be able to do.
Mitigation:
Implement strict input validation and sanitization for all user inputs. Use whitelisting techniques to ensure only expected values are accepted.
Line:
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
AC-3
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The data classes are serialized and deserialized without proper validation, which can lead to insecure deserialization vulnerabilities if the system interacts with untrusted sources or uses third-party libraries that are vulnerable.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service by manipulating the serialized objects.
Mitigation:
Implement strict type checking and validation during deserialization. Use secure serialization practices and consider using safer alternatives like JSON or protocol buffers if applicable.
Line:
OWASP Category:
A06:2021 - Vulnerable Components
NIST 800-53:
SC-13
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The code does not properly validate inputs for the `getByModelIdAnModelVer` method, which allows an attacker to craft a request that targets internal endpoints. This can lead to server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks where sensitive data is accessed or services are abused.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access unauthorized data and potentially gain further privileges within the system. It also undermines trust in the application by allowing external requests that were not intended, which can lead to a loss of control over service interactions.
Mitigation:
Implement input validation mechanisms to ensure only expected values are processed. Use whitelisting techniques to restrict inputs to known good values and block or log unexpected inputs. Consider using a safe-list approach where allowed domains or paths are explicitly defined, and disallowed patterns can be blocked.
Line:
45
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Short-term
The code contains hardcoded credentials in the `save` and `update` methods, which are used to create or update records. This exposes sensitive information directly in the source code.
Impact:
Hardcoded credentials can be easily accessed by anyone with access to the application's source code, leading to unauthorized access if these credentials match those of a service or database being accessed by the application.
Mitigation:
Avoid hardcoding any credentials. Use environment variables, configuration files, or secure vaults to manage and protect sensitive information. Ensure that such values are not included in version control systems where they could be exposed.
Line:
28, 59-64
OWASP Category:
A07:2021 - Authentication Failures
NIST 800-53:
IA-5 - Authenticator Management
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
None identified
Priority:
Immediate
The entity class `EzaAiModelTrainingHstry` stores sensitive information including model and data URLs in plain text columns without any encryption. This makes it vulnerable to unauthorized access and potential theft of sensitive data.
Impact:
Unauthorized individuals can easily read the stored URLs, potentially leading to exposure of proprietary models and datasets used for training AI models.
Mitigation:
Implement strong encryption mechanisms such as AES or RSA for columns storing modelUrl and dataUrl. Ensure that any decryption keys are securely managed and not hard-coded in the application.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
NIST 800-53:
SC-28 - Protection of Information at Rest
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The application does not properly handle the 'trainingCd' field, which is of type String. This can lead to uncontrolled resource consumption if an attacker provides a large string value for this field.
Impact:
Uncontrolled resource consumption can lead to denial of service (DoS) attacks where legitimate users are unable to use the application due to excessive memory or CPU usage.
Mitigation:
Consider using a length constraint on the 'trainingCd' field to limit its size. Alternatively, implement input validation to ensure that only expected values are accepted.
Line:
OWASP Category:
A05:2021 - Security Misconfiguration
NIST 800-53:
CM-6 - Configuration Settings
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The application does not enforce proper authentication mechanisms. The 'isActive' and 'createdBy' fields are optional but can be manipulated by an attacker, potentially leading to unauthorized access.
Impact:
An attacker could manipulate these fields to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data or perform actions without the necessary permissions.
Mitigation:
Enforce proper authentication mechanisms such as role-based access control (RBAC) and ensure that only authorized users can modify these fields. Consider implementing additional checks before allowing updates to these fields.
Line:
OWASP Category:
A07:2021 - Authentication Failures
NIST 800-53:
AC-2 - Account Management
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The repository interface does not enforce any authentication mechanism for the findByModelId function, which retrieves a model by its ID. This could allow unauthenticated users to access sensitive information.
Impact:
Unauthenticated users can retrieve sensitive data from the system, potentially leading to unauthorized disclosure of information or further exploitation.
Mitigation:
Implement authentication mechanisms such as API keys, OAuth tokens, or session management for all endpoints that handle sensitive data. Use Spring Security annotations like @PreAuthorize or custom security checks in your service layer.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A07:2021 - Authentication Failures
NIST 800-53:
AC-2, AC-3, IA-2
CVSS Score:
9.1
Related CVE:
None identified
Priority:
Immediate
The provided code does not include authentication mechanisms. Both `CreateEzaAiModelTraining` and `UpdateEzaAiModelTraining` classes are missing fields for username/password or tokens that would be required for proper authentication.
Impact:
Without proper authentication, an attacker can create, update, or access sensitive data without authorization, leading to unauthorized disclosure, modification, or destruction of information.
Mitigation:
Implement a strong authentication mechanism such as OAuth 2.0 with JWT tokens or basic authentication for both endpoints. Ensure that the `createdBy` and `updatedBy` fields are mandatory where appropriate.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A07:2021 - Authentication Failures
NIST 800-53:
IA-2 - Identification and Authentication
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The application does not properly validate the input for the '/search' endpoint, allowing an attacker to perform a server-side request forgery attack by manipulating the query parameters.
Impact:
An attacker can make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services or external domains, potentially leading to unauthorized data access, information disclosure, and other malicious activities.
Mitigation:
Implement input validation and sanitization for all user inputs. Use whitelisting mechanisms to restrict acceptable values and types of input. Consider using a safe API gateway or proxy that can filter out dangerous requests before they reach the application.
Line:
41-42
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The application uses hardcoded credentials in the configuration, which can be easily accessed and used by unauthorized users.
Impact:
Unauthorized access to sensitive information or system functionalities could lead to data theft, privilege escalation, and other severe consequences.
Mitigation:
Avoid using hardcoded credentials. Use secure vaults or externalized configuration management systems to store and manage secrets securely.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A07:2021 - Authentication Failures
NIST 800-53:
IA-2 - Identification and Authentication
CVSS Score:
6.1
Related CVE:
None identified
Priority:
Immediate
The application exposes direct references to internal objects, which can be manipulated by an attacker to access unauthorized data.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information or perform actions that they should not have the capability to execute.
Mitigation:
Implement proper authorization checks before accessing any object. Use strong authentication mechanisms and enforce least privilege access controls.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
NIST 800-53:
AC-2 - Account Management
CVSS Score:
7.4
Related CVE:
None identified
Priority:
Immediate
The function `getEzaAiModelTrainingByFields` constructs a query using untrusted input from the `fields` map. This can lead to an SQL injection vulnerability if the input is not properly sanitized or validated.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to perform unauthorized operations in the database, potentially leading to data leakage and system compromise.
Mitigation:
Use parameterized queries or prepared statements with a dedicated specification builder that does not rely on user-provided inputs. Alternatively, consider using an ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) framework that inherently handles such cases securely.
Line:
29-31
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The method `update` does not enforce any authentication checks before allowing updates. This could lead to unauthorized users modifying sensitive data.
Impact:
Unauthorized users can modify critical information in the database, potentially leading to significant financial loss or system unavailability.
Mitigation:
Implement robust authentication mechanisms such as OAuth 2.0 with JWT tokens for API endpoints and enforce role-based access control (RBAC) at the method level using security annotations like @RolesAllowed('ROLE_USER') in combination with a secure authentication mechanism.
Line:
45-48
OWASP Category:
A07:2021 - Authentication Failures
NIST 800-53:
AC-2 - Account Management
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The `update` method does not perform adequate validation on the input data before applying updates to the database. This can lead to SQL injection and other vulnerabilities.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to manipulate database records, potentially leading to unauthorized access or data corruption.
Mitigation:
Implement strict data validation mechanisms that do not rely on user-provided inputs for critical operations like updates. Use a dedicated service layer with input sanitization and validation before any persistence operation.
Line:
45-48
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The code does not validate the input before converting it to a JSON string, which can lead to security issues such as denial of service or unauthorized access if malicious data is passed.
Impact:
Malicious users could exploit this by passing invalid JSON data, causing the application to crash or potentially leading to unauthorized data exposure.
Mitigation:
Validate input before conversion using a proper JSON parser. Implement checks to ensure that only valid JSON objects are processed without throwing exceptions for malformed inputs.
Line:
20-24
OWASP Category:
A09:2021 - Security Logging Failures
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
6.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Short-term
The code does not handle exceptions appropriately when converting JSON nodes to strings, which can lead to potential security issues such as unauthorized data exposure.
Impact:
If an attacker can manipulate the input in a way that causes an exception during conversion, they might gain access to sensitive information or disrupt service.
Mitigation:
Implement proper error handling by catching exceptions and returning meaningful error messages. Consider using a more robust JSON library that provides better parsing capabilities with built-in validation.
Line:
20-24
OWASP Category:
A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
NIST 800-53:
SI-16 - Memory Protection
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Short-term
The function getTypeFromClassName does not properly validate the class type provided in className. It directly maps input to Class.forName, which can lead to loading arbitrary classes and potential exploitation.
Impact:
This vulnerability could allow an attacker to load arbitrary classes via classpath manipulation, potentially leading to remote code execution or other malicious activities.
Mitigation:
Implement a proper type validation mechanism before attempting to load the class. Use whitelisting of allowed class names instead of mapping them directly from input.
Line:
45-52
OWASP Category:
A06:2021 - Vulnerable Components
NIST 800-53:
IA-2 - Identification and Authentication
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The function `validate` does not properly validate the input type. It relies solely on a string comparison which can be easily manipulated by an attacker to bypass intended validation checks.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass intended validation and access unauthorized functionality or data, leading to potential data leakage or unauthorized actions.
Mitigation:
Implement stricter input validation mechanisms that do not rely on user-supplied inputs for critical decisions. Consider using a more robust method such as enums or state machines to manage different types of inputs.
Line:
15-26
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The function `extractName`, `extractEmail`, and `extractMobileNumber` use regular expressions that are too permissive. This can lead to unexpected matches, potentially allowing malicious input.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this by crafting inputs that would bypass the intended validation checks, leading to potential unauthorized access or data leakage.
Mitigation:
Use more restrictive and secure regex patterns for validation. For example, use anchors (`^` and `$`) at the start and end of your pattern to ensure exact matches, and consider using context-aware security libraries that enforce stricter rules.
Line:
29, 36, 43
OWASP Category:
A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The code does not properly validate the input fields, allowing for potential SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) attacks. The 'fields' map is directly used in a CriteriaQuery without any sanitization or validation of the keys and values.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to make arbitrary requests from the server, potentially accessing sensitive data or performing actions that are not intended by the application.
Mitigation:
Implement input validation mechanisms to ensure only expected fields and values are used. Use whitelisting instead of blacklisting for input validation to prevent SSRF attacks.
Line:
15-24
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The code deserializes user input directly into objects without proper validation or type checking, which can lead to insecure deserialization vulnerabilities. This is particularly dangerous if the serialized data comes from untrusted sources.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious serialized object that, when deserialized and executed on the server, could lead to remote code execution, unauthorized access, or other harmful effects.
Mitigation:
Implement strict validation of input types during deserialization. Use secure libraries for serialization/deserialization operations and consider using data-binding frameworks with built-in protections against insecure deserialization.
Line:
15-24
OWASP Category:
A06:2021 - Vulnerable Components
NIST 800-53:
SI-3 - Malicious Code Protection
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The method `getDetailById` returns an `Optional`, which can be directly exposed to the API without proper validation or access control checks. This exposes sensitive information and allows unauthorized access.
Impact:
Directly exposing optional data can lead to unauthorized disclosure of details, potentially leading to further exploitation such as identity theft or financial loss.
Mitigation:
Consider returning a custom response structure that includes status codes and error messages for invalid IDs. Implement proper access control mechanisms to ensure only authorized users can access detailed information.
Line:
21
OWASP Category:
A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
NIST 800-53:
AC-6 - Least Privilege, AC-2 - Account Management
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
None
Priority:
Immediate
The methods `getDetailByAgentId`, `getDetailByCustId`, and `createOrUpdateDetail` do not perform any input validation, which can lead to improper data handling and potential security issues.
Impact:
Improper input handling can lead to injection attacks or unauthorized modifications. For example, an attacker could manipulate the agent ID to access another user's details or inject malicious data during creation/update operations.
Mitigation:
Implement robust input validation mechanisms that check for expected formats and ranges of values. Use parameterized queries or prepared statements where applicable to prevent SQL injection or other types of attacks.
Line:
24, 27, 30
OWASP Category:
A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
NIST 800-53:
AC-6 - Least Privilege, AC-2 - Account Management
CVSS Score:
6.5
Related CVE:
None
Priority:
Immediate
The application stores sensitive data (customer details) without encryption. This makes it vulnerable to theft through unauthorized access.
Impact:
Sensitive information can be intercepted and decrypted by an attacker, leading to severe privacy violations and potential financial loss for the customers.
Mitigation:
Implement strong encryption algorithms such as AES or RSA for data storage. Use secure keys and ensure proper key management in compliance with NIST standards.
Line:
OWASP Category:
A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
NIST 800-53:
SC-28 - Protection of Information at Rest
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The application stores passwords in a clear text format within the database. This poses a significant security risk as it allows unauthorized users to easily access user credentials.
Impact:
Unauthorized individuals can gain access to user accounts by using the stored cleartext passwords, leading to potential identity theft and other malicious activities.
Mitigation:
Implement password hashing techniques such as bcrypt or scrypt with a minimum recommended cost factor. Ensure that passwords are not directly accessible in any form through application code or logs.
Line:
OWASP Category:
A08:2021 - Software and Data Integrity Failures
NIST 800-53:
IA-2 - Identification and Authentication
CVSS Score:
7.4
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The application does not properly validate input before using it in a SQL query, which makes it susceptible to SQL injection attacks.
Impact:
An attacker can manipulate the database queries through user-controlled input, leading to unauthorized data access and potential data loss or corruption.
Mitigation:
Use parameterized queries or stored procedures with prepared statements that take advantage of the capabilities of your underlying database system to ensure inputs are treated as pure data. Avoid direct use of unvalidated user inputs in SQL queries.
Line:
OWASP Category:
A03:2021 - Injection
NIST 800-53:
AC-3 - Access Enforcement
CVSS Score:
9.1
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The repository interface does not enforce any authentication mechanism for its methods, which could lead to unauthorized access and potential data leakage or manipulation.
Impact:
Unauthorized users can query the database directly using public endpoints without proper credentials, leading to exposure of sensitive customer details.
Mitigation:
Implement a security layer such as Spring Security with role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce authentication for methods like findByAgentId and findByCustId. Use @PreAuthorize annotations in combination with Spring Data JPA query methods.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A07:2021 - Authentication Failures
NIST 800-53:
AC-2, AC-3, IA-2
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
None identified
Priority:
Immediate
The application does not properly enforce authorization checks for accessing customer details. The API endpoints allow users to retrieve and manipulate sensitive information without proper authentication or authorization, which can lead to unauthorized data exposure.
Impact:
Unauthorized individuals can access sensitive customer details, potentially leading to identity theft, financial loss, and a violation of privacy rights.
Mitigation:
Implement robust authentication mechanisms such as OAuth 2.0 with appropriate scopes for each API endpoint. Use Spring Security to enforce role-based access control (RBAC) or attribute-based access control (ABAC). Validate user roles against the required permissions before processing any request that involves customer data.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
NIST 800-53:
AC-2, AC-3
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The repository interface does not enforce any authentication mechanism. This makes it vulnerable to unauthorized access, as anyone can interact with the repository without proper credentials.
Impact:
Unauthorized users could manipulate data or perform actions that were intended for authorized personnel, leading to significant disruptions and potential loss of sensitive information.
Mitigation:
Implement a security mechanism such as authentication tokens or API keys at the interface level. Ensure that only authenticated clients can access the repository methods.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A07:2021 - Authentication Failures
NIST 800-53:
IA-2 - Identification and Authentication
CVSS Score:
9.1
Related CVE:
None identified directly, but this is a pattern-based finding related to missing authentication in repository interfaces.
Priority:
Immediate
The data class `CreateEzaAiModelRetraining` contains a field `agentId` which is nullable but not properly handled during storage. This can lead to sensitive information being stored in plain text, potentially leading to unauthorized access.
Impact:
Sensitive information such as agent ID could be accessed by malicious users if the data store is compromised or logs are exposed.
Mitigation:
Use secure encryption methods to store sensitive fields like `agentId`. Ensure that all fields are properly handled during storage and retrieval to prevent unauthorized access.
Line:
45
OWASP Category:
A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
NIST 800-53:
SC-28 - Protection of Information at Rest
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The `CreateEzaAiModelRetraining` and `UpdateEzaAiModelRetraining` data classes do not perform adequate validation on input parameters, which can lead to injection vulnerabilities when these inputs are used in database queries or external API calls.
Impact:
Malicious users could exploit this by injecting SQL commands or manipulating requests to the server, leading to unauthorized access and potential data leakage.
Mitigation:
Implement strict validation rules for all input parameters. Use parameterized queries or sanitization methods to prevent injection attacks. Consider using a library like Spring Security for enhanced security in web applications.
Line:
45-52
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
AC-3 - Access Enforcement
CVSS Score:
9.1
Related CVE:
Priority:
Immediate
The entity class `EzaAiModelRetraining` stores sensitive information including `model_id`, `process_cd`, and potentially other fields in plain text without any encryption. This makes it vulnerable to unauthorized access and data leakage.
Impact:
Unauthorized individuals can easily read and use the sensitive information stored in this entity, leading to significant privacy violations and potential misuse of intellectual property or critical business processes.
Mitigation:
Implement strong encryption mechanisms for all fields that are considered sensitive. Consider using JPA attributes like `@Encrypted` if available, or implement custom encryption at rest solutions.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
NIST 800-53:
SC-28 - Protection of Information at Rest
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The `trainingCd` field in the `EzaAiModelRetraining` entity is not properly validated before being used. This could lead to unauthorized access and potential server-side request forgery attacks.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to perform unauthorized actions, such as accessing restricted data or manipulating internal services through forged requests, leading to significant disruptions and potentially compromising the integrity of the system.
Mitigation:
Implement input validation mechanisms that check the format and content of `trainingCd` before it is processed. Use whitelisting approaches to ensure only expected values are accepted.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
AC-3 - Access Enforcement
CVSS Score:
7.2
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The method `getByModelIdAndFields` does not properly validate the input parameters, allowing for potential SSRF attacks. The function constructs a query string based on user-provided fields without proper sanitization or validation of the 'model_id' field.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to make unauthorized requests from the server, potentially accessing sensitive internal resources or data.
Mitigation:
Implement input validation and sanitization mechanisms to ensure that only expected values are processed. Use whitelisting techniques to restrict 'model_id' to known valid values or patterns.
Line:
45-52
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
SC-13 - Cryptographic Protection
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
The method `findById` and `update` does not properly check for authorization before allowing access to certain resources. This could lead to unauthorized users accessing sensitive information or performing actions they are not permitted to.
Impact:
An attacker with valid user credentials can bypass access controls and gain unauthorized access to data or perform actions that should be restricted, potentially leading to further exploitation of other vulnerabilities.
Mitigation:
Implement proper authorization checks before allowing access to resources based on the identity and privileges of the authenticated user. Use role-based access control (RBAC) mechanisms where appropriate.
Line:
28, 45
OWASP Category:
A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
NIST 800-53:
AC-6 - Least Privilege
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
N/A
Priority:
Immediate
The application uses hard-coded credentials in the configuration file or codebase. This poses a significant security risk as it makes the system vulnerable to credential stuffing attacks and unauthorized access.
Impact:
An attacker with access to the configuration files could easily use the hard-coded credentials to gain unauthorized access to the system, leading to potential data theft and other malicious activities.
Mitigation:
Refactor the code to remove or encrypt hard-coded credentials. Use environment variables or a secrets management service for sensitive information.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A07:2021 - Authentication Failures
NIST 800-53:
IA-2 - Identification and Authentication
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
N/A
Priority:
Immediate
The application does not properly validate the input for the '/searchByModelIdAndFields/{modelId}' endpoint, which allows an attacker to perform a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. This can lead to unauthorized disclosure of internal resources or data.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access sensitive information from the internal network, including configuration files and other critical data.
Mitigation:
Implement input validation to ensure that only expected fields are accepted. Use a whitelist approach to restrict the allowed parameters. Consider using a safe-list of acceptable domains or hosts if necessary.
Line:
49-51
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Short-term
The application does not properly validate the 'modelId' parameter in the '/searchByModelIdAndFields/{modelId}' endpoint before forwarding or redirecting to another location. This can lead to unauthorized access and potential SSRF attacks.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information, manipulate internal data flows, or perform other malicious activities.
Mitigation:
Implement strict validation of the 'modelId' parameter to ensure it only contains expected values. Use a whitelist approach and reject any unexpected input.
Line:
54-56
OWASP Category:
A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Short-term
The application does not properly authenticate the user before allowing access to certain endpoints such as '/api/aiModelRetraining/{id}' and '/api/aiModelRetraining'. This could allow unauthenticated users to access sensitive information.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data, manipulate internal processes, or perform other malicious activities.
Mitigation:
Implement proper authentication mechanisms such as OAuth, JWT, or other secure token-based authentication methods. Ensure that all endpoints requiring authentication are properly secured and only accessible by authenticated users.
Line:
21-24, 27-30
OWASP Category:
A07:2021 - Authentication Failures
NIST 800-53:
AC-6 - Least Privilege, AC-3 - Access Enforcement
CVSS Score:
9.1
Related CVE:
None identified
Priority:
Immediate
The application contains hardcoded credentials in the configuration files, which can be easily accessed and used by unauthorized users. This includes database connection strings and other sensitive information.
Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to the system, manipulate data, or perform other malicious activities using the compromised credentials.
Mitigation:
Remove hardcoded credentials from the configuration files. Use environment variables or secure vaults for storing sensitive information.
Line:
Not applicable (configuration files)
OWASP Category:
A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
NIST 800-53:
CM-6 - Configuration Settings, IA-2 - Identification and Authentication
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
None identified
Priority:
Immediate
The `EzaAiModelDtls` class does not perform any validation on the input parameters such as `modelId`, `modelNm`, etc. This can lead to injection vulnerabilities if these fields are used in SQL queries or other operations that do not sanitize user inputs properly.
Impact:
An attacker could manipulate the input data to exploit the application, potentially leading to unauthorized access, data corruption, or system compromise.
Mitigation:
Implement input validation mechanisms at both client-side and server-side. Use parameterized queries or prepared statements in database interactions to prevent SQL injection attacks. Consider using libraries that enforce input validation rules for different types of inputs.
Line:
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Information Input Validation
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
6.5
Related CVE:
Priority:
Short-term
The `UpdateEzaAiModelDtls` data class does not include validation for the fields being updated. This can lead to issues where invalid or malicious data is accepted and processed, potentially causing unexpected behavior.
Impact:
Invalid data could cause system errors or incorrect state changes in model records, affecting application functionality and integrity.
Mitigation:
Add input validation checks in the update method to ensure that only valid data is accepted. Implement business logic rules to validate inputs before processing updates.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
NIST 800-53:
AC-2, AC-6
CVSS Score:
4.3
Related CVE:
None directly but related to CWE-20.
Priority:
Short-term
The `generateNewModelId` and `createModelIdBasedOnType` methods use a simple concatenation of strings without any randomness or uniqueness checks, which can lead to predictable model IDs.
Impact:
Predictable model IDs could allow attackers to guess or brute-force specific IDs, leading to potential unauthorized access or manipulation of these IDs.
Mitigation:
Implement a more secure method for generating unique and unpredictable model IDs. Consider using UUIDs or hashing functions combined with random inputs.
Line:
54-62
OWASP Category:
A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
NIST 800-53:
SC-13 - Use cryptographic protections to guard against attacks that exploit weak or predictable content protection algorithms.
CVSS Score:
5.9
Related CVE:
Priority:
Short-term
The application lacks sufficient logging for critical events such as user authentication failures and failed login attempts. This makes it difficult to track suspicious activities or detect potential security incidents.
Impact:
Without adequate logging, the ability to monitor system behavior and respond to security incidents is significantly reduced. An attacker could exploit this lack of logging to remain undetected during an attack.
Mitigation:
Implement robust logging mechanisms that capture all critical events including authentication failures and failed login attempts. Ensure logs are accessible for review by authorized personnel, but consider encrypting sensitive information in transit and at rest.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A09:2021 - Security Logging Failures
NIST 800-53:
AU-2 - Audit Events
CVSS Score:
4.3
Related CVE:
None identified
Priority:
Short-term
The `update` method does not properly validate the data being updated, which could lead to an attacker manipulating fields such as `updatedBy`, potentially leading to unauthorized modifications.
Impact:
An attacker can modify fields that should be protected or validated, leading to potential unauthorized access or manipulation of critical application data and functionality.
Mitigation:
Implement input validation mechanisms in the update method to ensure all inputs are properly sanitized. Use whitelisting where possible to restrict updates to known good values and block unexpected changes.
Line:
59-64
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
5.4
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Short-term
The entity `EzaAiModelTrainingHstry` uses a unique identifier (`id`) which is auto-generated by the database. However, other fields like `agentId`, `processCd`, `modelId` are also marked as unique but do not have any constraints or indices enforced in the database.
Impact:
While the primary key constraint prevents direct SQL injection for these columns, it does not prevent manipulation of data through application logic. This can lead to inconsistencies and potential security issues if not properly handled.
Mitigation:
Enforce unique constraints on `agentId`, `processCd`, and `modelId` fields in the database schema using foreign keys or appropriate indices where applicable. Validate inputs at the application level to ensure integrity of data stored in these columns.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A08:2021 - Software and Data Integrity Failures
NIST 800-53:
SI-2 - Flaw Remediation
CVSS Score:
4.7
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Short-term
The `CreateEzaAiModelTraining` and `UpdateEzaAiModelTraining` classes do not perform any validation on the input data, which can lead to injection vulnerabilities or incorrect application behavior.
Impact:
Improper validation of inputs can allow attackers to manipulate requests, leading to SQL injection, command injection, or other types of injections that could compromise the database or system integrity.
Mitigation:
Implement input validation mechanisms for all fields. Use regular expressions or whitelisting techniques to ensure data conforms to expected formats and patterns.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Information Input Validation
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
6.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Short-term
The `CreateEzaAiModelTraining` and `UpdateEzaAiModelTraining` classes store sensitive information such as `modelId`, `modelVer`, `dataVer`, and potentially other fields in plain text, which can be easily accessed by unauthorized users.
Impact:
Insecure storage of data leads to the exposure of sensitive information, increasing the risk of theft or misuse through various attacks including phishing or social engineering.
Mitigation:
Use encryption techniques such as AES or RSA to secure sensitive fields. Consider implementing a secure vault for storing keys and secrets.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
NIST 800-53:
SC-28 - Protection of Information at Rest
CVSS Score:
6.0
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Short-term
The function setDefaultZonedDateTime uses a hardcoded default time zone ('Asia/Kolkata') which does not provide any flexibility and might lead to issues in environments where the default timezone is different.
Impact:
This can cause inconsistencies in date-time handling, potentially leading to bugs or security issues if the application relies on accurate time information for security decisions.
Mitigation:
Consider making the time zone configurable via a property file or environment variable. This would allow developers and operators to set an appropriate timezone based on their requirements.
Line:
1-2
OWASP Category:
A05:2021 - Security Misconfiguration
NIST 800-53:
AC-6 - Least Privilege
CVSS Score:
4.3
Related CVE:
None identified
Priority:
Short-term
The method `getDetailByAgentId` and `getDetailByCustId` return nullable types (`EzaPlatformCustomerDetails?`), which can lead to potential null pointer exceptions if not handled properly.
Impact:
Null reference errors can crash the application or expose sensitive data. Additionally, improper handling of nulls can lead to unauthorized access to partial information.
Mitigation:
Ensure that all nullable return types are checked for null before dereferencing them. Implement strict input validation and access controls to prevent direct exposure of potentially null data.
Line:
24, 27
OWASP Category:
A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
NIST 800-53:
AC-6 - Least Privilege, AC-2 - Account Management
CVSS Score:
5.3
Related CVE:
None
Priority:
Short-term
The application uses hardcoded credentials in its configuration, which can be easily accessed and used by unauthorized users to gain access to the system.
Impact:
Unauthorized individuals could exploit these credentials to gain privileged access to the system, leading to a complete compromise of the application and potentially sensitive data.
Mitigation:
Refactor the code to remove hardcoded credentials. Use environment variables or secure configuration management tools like HashiCorp Vault to store and manage sensitive information securely.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
NIST 800-53:
IA-2
CVSS Score:
6.5
Related CVE:
Priority:
Short-term
The `GetEzaAiModelDtls` data class does not include validation for the fields being retrieved. This can lead to issues where invalid or malicious data is accepted and returned, potentially exposing sensitive information.
Impact:
Invalid data could expose sensitive model details, violating privacy and confidentiality requirements.
Mitigation:
Add input validation checks in the retrieval method to ensure that only valid data is accepted and returned. Implement business logic rules to validate inputs before processing retrievals.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
NIST 800-53:
AC-2, AC-6
CVSS Score:
4.3
Related CVE:
None directly but related to CWE-20.
Priority:
Medium-term
The `trainingCd` field in the entity `EzaAiModelTrainingHstry` is not subjected to any validation or sanitization. This could allow an attacker to manipulate this parameter through a web request and perform actions that are unintended by the system's design.
Impact:
While direct impact might be limited, improper handling of parameters can lead to SSRF attacks where external systems can be targeted for data retrieval or manipulation.
Mitigation:
Implement input validation mechanisms in the application layer to ensure only expected values (e.g., predefined codes) are accepted by the `trainingCd` field. Use whitelisting approaches instead of blacklisting based on known bad patterns.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
AC-6 - Least Privilege
CVSS Score:
2.1
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Medium-term