Scan Overview

6
Total Issues
Files Scanned: 4
Target: vulnerability-scan@10

Severity Distribution

0
Blocker
0
Critical
6
High
0
Medium
0
Low
0
Info

Detailed Findings

High CWE-20

Improper Input Validation

vulnerability-scan@10/final.py

The code does not perform proper validation of the input distance, which could lead to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. An attacker can manipulate the input to make the application send requests to unintended endpoints.

Impact:
An attacker could exploit SSRF to access internal services or data that the application is supposed to be protected from, leading to unauthorized disclosure of information or even remote code execution in certain configurations.
Mitigation:
Implement proper validation and sanitization of input distance. Use whitelisting mechanisms to restrict acceptable values for distance inputs.
Line:
45
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
High CWE-20

Improper Input Validation

vulnerability-scan@10/top_view.py

The code does not perform proper validation or sanitization of user inputs, which could lead to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack. An attacker can exploit this by crafting a URL that triggers the application to make unintended outbound requests.

Impact:
An attacker can use SSRF to access internal networks, bypass firewalls, and interact with services that are not intended to be accessed from outside the network, potentially leading to unauthorized data disclosure or other malicious activities.
Mitigation:
Implement input validation mechanisms to ensure only expected URL schemes (e.g., HTTP, HTTPS) are accepted. Use whitelisting techniques to restrict the allowed hosts and ports.
Line:
N/A
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
SI-10 - Information Input Validation
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
High CWE-20

Improper Input Validation

vulnerability-scan@10/test.py

The code does not properly validate the input for 'bounce_idx' which is derived from user input (y_coords). This can lead to a buffer overflow or other undefined behavior if an attacker manipulates this value.

Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the bounce point index, leading to incorrect calculations and potentially crashing the application or executing arbitrary code.
Mitigation:
Implement input validation mechanisms that check for expected ranges and formats. Use parameterized queries or sanitization methods to ensure user inputs are safe before processing them in your application.
Line:
45-52
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
IA-10 - Malicious Code Protection
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
High CWE-798

Use of Hardcoded Credentials

vulnerability-scan@10/test.py

The code includes hardcoded credentials in the form of 'pts_src' and 'pts_dst' for perspective transformation. This makes it vulnerable to attacks if these values are exposed.

Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using the hardcoded values to perform unauthorized actions, such as accessing sensitive data or manipulating system configurations.
Mitigation:
Avoid hardcoding credentials and secrets in your source code. Use secure configuration management practices that do not expose these values directly.
Line:
56-59
OWASP Category:
A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
NIST 800-53:
AC-2 - Account Management
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
High CWE-722

Insecure Configuration

vulnerability-scan@10/test.py

The code does not implement secure configuration settings, such as using default or weak cryptographic algorithms without proper justification.

Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by exploiting the insecure configuration to gain unauthorized access or manipulate system behavior.
Mitigation:
Ensure that all configurations are reviewed for security implications. Use secure defaults and only deviate from them when there is a valid technical reason to do so, following security best practices.
Line:
56-59
OWASP Category:
A05:2021 - Security Misconfiguration
NIST 800-53:
AC-2 - Account Management
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate
High CWE-20

Improper Input Validation

vulnerability-scan@10/plotPoints.py

The code does not perform proper validation or sanitization of the 'image_path' variable before using it to read an image file. This can lead to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack where an attacker can make the application send requests to internal or external resources, potentially leading to unauthorized data disclosure, network access, and other malicious activities.

Impact:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to conduct SSRF attacks, accessing internal networks, fetching sensitive information from services running on the server, and even interacting with backend systems through the application's interface.
Mitigation:
Use a whitelist approach for validating file paths or implement strict validation mechanisms that do not allow arbitrary external resources to be accessed. Alternatively, consider using libraries like 'requests' with safe mode enabled when dealing with URLs.
Line:
L6
OWASP Category:
A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery
NIST 800-53:
SC-13 - Cryptographic Protection
CVSS Score:
7.5
Related CVE:
Pattern-based finding
Priority:
Immediate